Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Alveraz v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2022cv01590
Plaintiff: Michael Alveraz
Defendant: City of Roseville and Roseville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Interested Party: East 71, Ltd., Brahman Partners II, L.P., Brahman Partners III, L.P. and others
Petitioner: Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, Barry Baker, Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement System of Chicago and others
Consolidated Defendant: Shlomo Yanai, Yitzhak Peterburg, Yaacov Altman and others
Intervenor: United States of America and HMG Global Initiative Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Robles et al v. Riano et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00085
Plaintiff: Katherine Robles and H. R.
Defendant: Dean Riano, Seth Addington, Christopher Ciampa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boniecki v. City of Roseville We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv12401
Plaintiff: Ted Boniecki
Defendant: City of Roseville
(PC) Melger v. City of Roseville Police et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01686
Plaintiff: Thomas Joseph Melger
Defendant: City of Roseville Police, Officer Paul and County of Placer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Grupo Televisa Securiti
as 21-1499
Respondent: Melvin Gross, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Arrowstreet Capital LP, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. and others
Petitioner: Palm Tran, Inc. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1577 Pension Plan, Individually and on behalf of the certified class, Gilardi & Co., LLC, Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Pension Plan and others
Amicus Curiae: Securities and Procedure Scholars, City of Dearborn Heights Police and Fire Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Employees Retirement System and others
Macomb County Employees' Retir, et al v. Align Technology, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15823
Plaintiff: CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: JULIE TAY, JOSEPH M. HOGAN, JOHN F. MORICI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MACOMB COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff
Arceo v. City of Roseville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02334
Defendant: Ashley Joel Pilgrim, City of Roseville, Daniel Timoney and others
Plaintiff: Alejandro Arceo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arceo v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2020at01156
Defendant: City of Roseville, Daniel Timoney, CEP - America - California DBA Vituity Hospitalists and others
Plaintiff: Alejandro Arceo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re Align Technology, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02897
Defendant: John F. Morici, Joseph M. Hogan and Align Technology Inc
Plaintiff: City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System and Macomb County Employees' Retirement System
Petitioner: Raj Grandhi, District No. 9, I.A. of M. & A.W. Pension Trust, Patricia Colbert and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?