Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Stockton v. Page
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Joe Page, Arkansas Department of Corrections, M Cobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burks v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terrence Burks, Cobbs, Newburn and others
Defendant:
Lewis, Donzell Lewis, Matthew Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurck v. Lonoke County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2023cv00011
Defendant:
Danielle Cobb, Lonoke County Sheriff Department, John Staley and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D Kurck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCullough v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Walter A McCullough
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Branch, Mary Cobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hamner v. Felts et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
John Felts, Arkansas Parole Board, Martha Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
James Randy Scott
Defendant:
Sherwood Arkansas, City of, Stephen Cobb and Sheila Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Dillard v. Tanner et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Dillard, III
Defendant:
Dawn Lee Tanner, Dexter Payne, G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
