Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Company Doe v. Inez Tenenbaum
as 12-2210
Plaintiff - Appellee: COMPANY DOE
Defendant - Appellant: INEZ TENENBAUM, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
Party-in-Interest: PUBLIC CITIZEN, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA and CONSUMERS UNION
American Gutter Filter, Inc. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05874
Plaintiff: American Gutter Filter, Inc.
Defendant: Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. consumerreport.com et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00268
Plaintiff: Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
Defendant: consumerreport.com, consumerreport.org, consumersreport.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Ofc Comm United Church of Chri v. FCC
as 08-4467
Petitioner: OFC COMM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST INC
Intervenor Petitioner: MEDIA GENERAL INC
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
Proposed Intervenor Petitioner: BELO CORP, CLEAR CHANNEL COMM, RP, GANNETT CO INC and others
Proposed Intervenor Respondent: NEWSPAPER ASSN AMER and COX ENTR INC
Proposed Intervenor: MORRIS COMM CO LLC
Media Alliance v. FCC
as 08-4454
Petitioner: MEDIA ALLIANCE
Intervenor Petitioner: NEWSPAPER ASSN AMER, TRIBUNE CO and FOX TV STATIONS INC
Proposed Intervenor Petitioner: SMALLER MARKET TV STATION, MORRIS COMM CO LLC, COX ENTR INC and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
Free Press v. FCC
as 08-4455
Petitioner: FREE PRESS
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
Proposed Intervenor Respondent: MEDIA GENERAL INC and MEDIA ALLIANCE
Proposed Intervenor Petitioner: CONSUMER FEDR AMER and CONSUMERS UNION
Consumers Union of United Stat v. FCC, et al
as 08-1318
Petitioner: Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Comcast Corporation v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1291
Petitioner: Comcast Corporation
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner: NBC Universal, National Cable & Telecommunications Association and Qwest Communications International Inc.
Intervenor For Respondent: Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Free Press and Public Knowledge and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: The Progress & Freedom Foundation, James B. Speta, Professor and Glen O. Robinson
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Barbara van Schewick, Professor, Lawrence Lessig, Jack M. Balkin and others
Verizon California, Inc. v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1234
Petitioner: Verizon California, Inc., Verizon Delaware, Inc., Verizon Florida, LLC and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner: Qwest Communications International Inc., United States Telecom Association and Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliance
Intervenor For Respondent: Bright House Networks, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Time Warner Cable, Incorporated and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Consumers Union and National Cable & Telecommunications Association
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent: National Cable & Telecommunications Association, COMPTEL, Consumers Union and others
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 572 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. BIOVAIL CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02433
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 572 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Petitioner: CONSUMERS UNION, AETNA, INC., THE AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE and others
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC, BIOVAIL LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL SRL, BIOVAIL LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?