Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Damron v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jonathan T. Damron, Randy Howerton, Brandon Michel Lane and others
Defendant:
Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center, Sgt. Cox, Corp. Sturgil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Hanes, Corp. Pack and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Michel Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Hanes, Corp. Pack and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michel Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howerton v. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Pack, Corp. Sampson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Howerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Case Manager Yonash et al
as 5:2021cv00014
Respondent:
P. McKone, F-2 Counselor Jorge, Case Manager Yonash and others
Petitioner:
Brandon Marquis Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00059
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CO Dale Griffith, Counselor Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Warden Adams et al
as 5:2020cv00187
Defendant:
Captain Squires, Captain Perez, SIA Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Cecile M. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bacon v. Maruka et al
as 1:2020cv00343
Defendant:
Mr. Shrader, Mr. Estep, Ms. Leslie and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Bacon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blake v. Stepp et al
as 3:2020cv00178
Plaintiff:
Bobby Blake
Defendant:
Counselor Stepp and Counselor Philipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Young et al
as 5:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Corr. Officer J. D. James, Warden D. L. Young, Counselor C. Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Thurman Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.