Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Easley v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2010cv05635
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Sheriff Department, Gerhard Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. County of San Benito et al
as 5:2010cv05520
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Defendant:
County of San Benito, San Benito Sheriff Dept., Ramon Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. City of Morgan Hill et al
as 3:2010cv02640
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
City of Morgan Hill, City of San Jose, County of Santa Clara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2009cv05874
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara County Sheriff Dept., Gerhard Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2009cv05874
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara County Sheriff Dept., Gerhard Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. County of San Benito et al
as 5:2009cv05755
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of San Benito, San Benito Sheriff Dept., Ramon Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. County of San Benito et al
as 4:2009cv05755
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of San Benito, San Benito Sheriff Dept., Ramon Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. County of El Dorado Probation Department et al
as 2:2008cv01432
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Easley
Defendant:
County of El Dorado Probation Department, Mike Cook, Rich Horn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Easley v. California State
as 2:2007cv00629
Petitioner:
Gary D Easley
Respondent:
California State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
