Cases 11 - 20 of 35
In re: Richard Hammond
as 11-3434
Petitioner - Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD A. HAMMONDS
Respondent:
RANDY JUSTICE, KOVAC, MAXWELL and others
PRESERVATION PITTSBURGH v. CONTURO et al
as 2:2011cv00889
Plaintiff:
PRESERVATION PITTSBURGH
Defendant:
MARY CONTURO , ROB STEPHANY, LUKE RAVENSTAHL and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
PONDEXTER v. THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv00857
Plaintiff:
EARL A. PONDEXTER
Defendant:
THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, DAN ONORATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PENDLETON v. ONORATO et al
as 3:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
DAN ONORATO, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, CYRIL H. WECHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. RUSTIN et al
as 2:2010cv01474
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY S. WALLACE
Defendant:
RAYMOND RUSTIN, DAN ONORATO, KEEFE COMMISSARY NET. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Johnston v. Dan Onorato, et al
as 10-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JOHNSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN ONORATO, RAMON RUSTIN, RONALD POFI and others
Frederick Banks v. Comm of PA, et al
as 10-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM OF PA, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, GOV PA and others
SIMEONE v. RUSTIN et al
as 2:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M. SIMEONE
Defendant:
RAYMOND C. RUSTIN, DANA PHILLIPS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSTON v. ONORATO et al
as 2:2009cv01681
Plaintiff:
RONALD JOHNSTON
Defendant:
DAN ONORATO, RAMON RUSTIN, RONALD POFI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 2:2009cv01437
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD G. RENDELL, PEDRO A. CORTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
