Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Empire Today, LLC v. National Floors Direct, Inc.
as 11-1766
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMPIRE TODAY, LLC
Defendant:
RAJENDRO BISSO, SAMUEL ROSENBERG, BARRY AMIDON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL FLOORS DIRECT, INC.
Interested Party:
ROBERT CARTER
Empire Today, LLC v. National Floors Direct, inc., et al
as 10-2343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMPIRE TODAY, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL FLOORS DIRECT, INC., SAMUEL ROSENBERG, DANIEL ROSENBERG and others
Defendant:
RAJENDRO BISSO, BARRY AMIDON, JACK DANHOF and others
Interested Party:
ROBERT CARTER
Empire Today, LLC v. National Floors Direct, inc.
as 10-2343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMPIRE TODAY, LLC
Defendant:
RAJENDRO BISSO, BARRY AMIDON, JACK DANHOF and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL FLOORS DIRECT, INC.
Interested Party:
ROBERT CARTER
Faust v. National Floors Direct, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv10554
Plaintiff:
Sidney Vincente Faust
Defendant:
National Floors Direct, Inc., Aaron Rosenberg, Daniel Rosenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Harrison Ventures, LLC et al v. Alta Mira Treatment Center et al
as 4:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Harrison Ventures, LLC, Bulkey Ventures, LLC and Sausalito Alta Mira, LLC
Defendant:
Alta Mira Treatment Center, Alta Mira Treatment Center, Dual Diagnosis Management, L.L.C., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Carbajal v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2009cv02663
Plaintiff:
Dean Carbajal
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Bill Ritter, 7th Judicial District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Empire Today, LLC v. National Floors Direct, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11999
Plaintiff:
Empire Today, LLC
Defendant:
National Floors Direct, Inc., Rajendro Bisso, Samuel Rosenberg and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert Carter and Marianne B. Bowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
