Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Young v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2018cv00879
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Daniel Myers, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Attorney General's Office, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, RODNEY CHISM, DAVID LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Link v. Eustis Cable Enterprises, Ltd.
as 1:2017cv02204
Plaintiff:
David Link
Defendant:
Eustis Cable Enterprises, LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Proctor v. Graffus et al
as 3:2016cv01666
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Proctor
Defendant:
C.O. Graffus, Sgt. Grassmyer, Lt. Lusk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padmanabhan v. Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid, et al
as 15-2268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANABHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD and WILLIAM KASSLER
Defendant:
SIMON AHTARIDIS, M.D., MOACIR BARBOSA, ALLISON BAYER and others
Respondent:
JULIAN HARRIS, JAMES PAIKOS, STEPHEN HOCTOR and others
In Re: Padmanabhan
as 15-1638
Petitioner:
BHARANIDHARAN PADMANBHAN
Respondent:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, (Boston Regional Office), RAYMOND HURD, WILLIAM KASSLER and others
Link v. W.L. Markers, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00960
Plaintiff:
David Link
Defendant:
W.L. Markers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
