Cases 11 - 20 of 356
Daniel Rodriguez v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03647
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Daniel Rodriguez v. Warden Janson
as 23-6702
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI EDGEFIELD
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15776
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Wigginton v. United States Postal Inspection Services et al
as 3:2023cv50186
Plaintiff:
Beverly Wigginton, Richard Wigginton, T.L.W. et. al. and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Inspection Services, Gary Barksdale, Alejandro E. Almaguer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Janson FCI Edgefield
as 1:2023cv01893
Petitioner:
Daniel Angel Rodriguez and Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Janson FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
