Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Dove v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00416
Defendant:
Charlie Wilson, Douglas Wardlow and Ron Neal
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Dove
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Miami Correctional Facility
as 3:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo M Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geico Casualty Company v. Mangai et al
as 1:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company
Defendant:
Nerad Grace Mangai , Brooke Mekete Dagnew , Kirubel Alemayehu Hailu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mangai et al v. Evans et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Nerad Grace Mangai , Brooke Mekete Dagnew , Kirubel Alemayehu Hailu and others
Defendant:
Deangelo R. Evans, Mercedez Main and GEICO Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatch v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 1:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo L Hatch
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Child Services, Chrystal Graham, Jennifer Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERBY v. GAIL
as 3:2017cv00054
Petitioner:
DEANGELO M. ERBY
Respondent:
R. GAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAINES v. BRICKERT et al
as 2:2016cv00318
Defendant:
CRYSTAL BRICKERT, JOHN BRUSH, BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, FINOTE ASFAW, BRYAN BULLER and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BRYAN BULLER, FARRAH BUNCH and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. USA
as 1:2016cv00133
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Deangelo Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
