Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Harding v. Roush et al
as 5:2012ct03136
Plaintiff:
Sylvester E. Harding, III
Defendant:
R. Roush, D. Bullard, Clayton Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dick v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012hc02085
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Edward Dick
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEPHENS v. HUGGINS et al
as 1:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTONIO STEPHENS
Defendant:
J.C. HUGGINS , CRISCOE , DICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrus v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 3:2010mc00160
Plaintiff:
Tamara Barrus
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Movant:
Global Compliance Services, Inc.
BRANTLEY et al v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS et al
as 1:2010cv00801
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DAY , LINDA BRANTLEY and BENJAMIN RIVENBARK
Defendant:
DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. , GALYAN'S TRADING COMPANY, INC. , EDWARD STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duggins v. Jenkins
as 5:2010hc02193
Petitioner:
Francis Duggins
Respondent:
Dick Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Whitfield v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2010ct03151
Plaintiff:
Douglas G. Whitfield
Defendant:
Dick Jenkins, Randle Smith and Darrel Land
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twin City Knitting Company, Inc. v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00071
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. and Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Twin City Knitting Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Arunga v. Clinton et al
as 3:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
James Aggrey- Kweggyirr Arunga
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Reid-Schumer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
