Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 21-40243
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Adams v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv01088
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Sr. Warden Jeffery S. Richardson, Assistant Warden Terry W. Burson and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Douglas Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00215
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv00121
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ADAMS and WANDA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Precythe
as 3:2020cv05129
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Anne L. Precythe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Blakinger
as 20-20603
Defendant / Appellee:
John Bridges, Editor Austin Newspaper, Keri Blakinger, Editor Houston Chronicle Newspaper and Louie Gohmert, U.S. Representative
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Douglas Adams
Mark Adams v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-40507
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Adams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00340
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2020cv00610
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00508
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
