Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Order Appointing United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle
as 2:2019mc03849
In Re:
Order Appointing United States Magistrate Judge Stephen M. Doyle
Crowe v. Adkins et al
as 2:2018cv00803
Petitioner:
Thomas Doyle Crowe
Respondent:
Ron Adkins
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamm v. Dunn
as 5:2018cv00348
Petitioner:
Doyle Lee Hamm
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamm v. Dunn et al
as 2:2017cv02083
Plaintiff:
Doyle Lee Hamm
Defendant:
Jefferson S Dunn , Cynthia Stewart and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Allison et al
as 6:2016cv01106
Plaintiff:
Doyle Jerome Clark
Defendant:
Rick Allison, June Marie Clark, Jerry K Selman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Daniel Aguirre, Richard Haluska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle Dickerson Terrazzo Inc v. Brasfield & Gorrie LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
Doyle Dickerson Terrazzo Inc
Defendant:
Brasfield & Gorrie LLC, Federal Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crowe v. Morton et al
as 2:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Thomas Doyle Crowe
Defendant:
Celia Morton, Southern Health Partners, Dr. Cideus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Doyle Dickerson Terrazzo Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00753
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Doyle Dickerson Terrazzo Inc , WG Yates & Sons Construction Company and Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawk v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
as 5:2015cv00462
Petitioner:
Doyle Kordell Hawk
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
