Cases 11 - 20 of 168
DUKE v. HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00865
Defendant:
SATTAR SHAIK and HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HART et al v. DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 5:2020cv01462
Defendant:
DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, IH SERVICES, INC. and DUKE REALTY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JANET HART and PAUL HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes v. Mohl et al
as 1:2020cv00315
Defendant:
C.O. Tedesco, Lt. Mohl, C.O. Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
James Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. v. DUKE & COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2018cv04203
Plaintiff:
COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
DUKE & COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bressi v. McCloud et al
as 4:2018cv01345
Defendant:
John Gembic, Michael Toomey, Snyder County Prison Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Bressi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. BREWTUS BREWING CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , INTERIOR MUSIC CORP. , MJ PUBLISHING TRUST and others
Defendant:
BREWTUS BREWING CO., INC., JOHN LAROCCA, JASON CAMERLENGO and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DUKES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2018cv00383
Petitioner:
JAMES DUKES
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _____________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _____________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
