Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Coleman et al v. Ward et al
as 3:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Wicker, Deputy Warden Keith, Tim Ward and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Roberts, Torrey Coleman, Trayon Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. GDCP CERT Team et al
as 1:2019cv05802
Defendant:
GDCP Ms. Jester, GDCP Warden of Care and Treatment and GDCP CERT Team
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Raheem Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. SCHOFILL et al
as 7:2019cv00158
Defendant:
COREY SELLERS, LOUIS SCHOFILL, THOMAS COUNTY DRUG SQUAD and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MITCHELL LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Flame Bar & Grill, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Flame Bar & Grill, LLC and Raiford C. Dunbar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 USC 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Dunbar
as 1:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Raiford C Dunbar, III
Cause Of Action: 47.U.S.C. 332(c)(7) Federal Communications Act of 1996
OWENS v. HARMON et al
as 5:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS, III
Defendant:
JEROME HARMON, MICHAEL GILBERT, MARTIN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. Schofill et al
as 7:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
IYANNA BEY
Defendant:
LOUIS SCHOFILL, MAURICE HOLMES, JABAR DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham et al v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv03130
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gresham, Sean R. Hill, Darryl Eldridge and others
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia, Theodore Jackson, Mark Adger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Levett et al
as 1:2015cv03101
Plaintiff:
Bryan J. Knight
Defendant:
Eric J. Levett, Correct Care Solutions and Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
