Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 176
NOE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24005
Plaintiff: ERIC MICHAEL NOE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Lujan
as 23-10145
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Eric Michael Lujan
ALFREDSEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02777
Plaintiff: ERIC MICHAEL ALFREDSEN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stroeve v. Massie et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff: Eric Michael Stroeve
Defendant: Timothy Massie, Alan Brissette, Wade Ikehara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Freeburg v. Susan Washburn
as 22-36032
Petitioner / Appellant: ERIC MICHAEL FREEBURG
Respondent / Appellee: SUSAN WASHBURN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon
D. Jacobs v. Eric Michael Garcetti et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv08010
Plaintiff: D. JACOBS
Defendant: ERIC MICHAEL GARCETTU, PAUL KREKORIAN, ROBERT BLUMENFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUCK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20490
Plaintiff: ERIC MICHAEL RUCK
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOSSERT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18778
Plaintiff: ERIC MICHAEL BOSSERT
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER et al v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITIES et al
as 2:2022cv03639
Plaintiff: STAMAR RICHARD MILLER, JAHMAD LOCKITT, BRIAN LOWRIE and others
Defendant: GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITIES and WARDEN L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIRMON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14603
Plaintiff: ERIC MICHAEL SIMON and ERIC MICHAEL SIRMON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?