Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Thomas Everette, Jr. v. Regina Peele
as 14-7660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EVERETTE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
REGINA W. PEELE, CREDITED SOLUTIONS, KIM D. SAUNDER and others
Everette, Jr. v. Peele et al
as 5:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Everette, Jr.
Defendant:
Regina W. Peele, Credited Solutions, Kim D. Saunder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyson et al v. Le'Chris Health System Incorporated et al
as 4:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Annie Battle Dyson and Aaron Purnell Dyson
Defendant:
Le'Chris Health System Incorporated and Edgecombe County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyson et al v. Le'Chris Health System Incorporated et al
as 5:2013cv00723
Plaintiff:
Annie Battle Dyson and Aaron Purnell Dyson
Defendant:
Le'Chris Health System Incorporated, Edgecombe County Government, Leonard Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Wilson v. Edgecombe County Detention Center
as 5:2013ct03099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stewart Wilson
Defendant:
Edgecombe County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Edgecombe County Jail
as 5:2013hc02095
Petitioner:
Osborne Parnell Bennett, Jr.
Respondent:
Edgecombe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nixon v. Edgecombe County Detention Center
as 5:2013mc00023
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Leon Nixon
Defendant:
Edgecombe County Detention Center
Arrington v. The City of Rocky Mount et al
as 4:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Toney Lee Arrington
Defendant:
The City of Rocky Mount, B. C. Lawton, M. B. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
