Cases 11 - 20 of 20
USA v. Eduardo Pena
as 17-50113
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO PENA, AKA Eduardo Pena Ibarra
Pena et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 7:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Pena and Maria Garcia
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Steven Yoder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jesus Pena-Lucero
as 16-41683
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS EDUARDO PENA-LUCERO
Dickey v. 3S Services, LLC
as 2:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dickey, JB Burns, Jr, Quentin B Burns and others
Defendant:
3S Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pena-Vega v. USA
as 3:2013cv01062
Respondent:
USA
Defendant:
Eduardo Pena-Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Manuel Pena
as 12-41356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL EDUARDO PENA
Quezada et al v. Responsible Roofing, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00821
Plaintiff:
Federico Quezada , Antonio Quezada , Porfirio Zamora and others
Defendant:
Responsible Roofing, Inc., Paul Marvin Elmore, Jr. , David Landeros and others
Mediator:
Suzanne Nusbaum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Zamora et al v. Responsible Roofing, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv04905
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Zamora , Mario Nieves and Felipe Quezada
Defendant:
Responsible Roofing, Inc., Paul Marvin Elmore, Jr. , Eduardo Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zamora et al v. Responsible Roofing, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv04905
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Zamora, Mario Nieves and Felipe Quezada
Defendant:
Responsible Roofing, Inc., Paul Marvin Elmore, Jr., Eduardo Pena and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
