Cases 11 - 20 of 96
TIERNO v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TIERNO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ESTOCK, E, BROWN, CAPTAIN BOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE AND PROBATION et al
as 2:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
DERRICK GIBSON
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE AND PROBATION and SUPERINTENDENT LEE J. ESTOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEAL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. BEAL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, RICHARD BOWER and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF PENNSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICKER v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
DAVID EDWARD RICKER
Respondent:
L. J. ESTOCK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POPOTE v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv04773
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MUESES POPOTE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, JOSH SHAPIRO and JOHN T. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POPOTE v. ESTOCK et al
as 5:2022cv04773
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MUESES POPOTE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, JOSH SHAPIRO, JOHN T. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PURNELL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv04050
Petitioner:
SHERON JALEN PURNELL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEAVER v. ESTOCK et al
as 5:2022cv03872
Petitioner:
LOVELLE WEAVER
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORTIZ v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
MACKENNETH ORTIZ
Defendant:
LEE ESTOCK, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT YINGLING and SCI P.N.G. MEDICAL DEPT. ADMIN. (WELLPATH)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Shane Holloway v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-2111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE HOLLOWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL and LEE ESTOCK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
