Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Nooner v. State Of Texas et al
as 6:2019cv00252
Defendant:
Judge FNU Harris, Judge FNU Schewski, Judge FNU Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. State Of Texas et al
as 6:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Judge FNU Harris, Judge FNU Schewski, Judge FNU Jetser and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Gallegos et al
as 1:2019cv00128
Defendant:
FNU Dawson, Mark Gallegos and Curry County Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00090
Defendant:
Weber County, Davis County, FNU Dawson and others
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Shane R. Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. GEO Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
GEO Corrections, Amber Martin, FNU Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Martin, et al
as 17-6060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMBER MARTIN, JOHNNY BLEVINS, FNU WEEKS and others
Davis v. GEO Group Corrections, et al
as 17-6059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity, HECTOR RIOS, JR., Warden, individually and in his official capacity and others
Davis v. Martin et al
as 5:2016cv01375
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Amber Martin, Johnny Blevins, FNU Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gurley v. Clark, et al
as 15-6105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRILL DEWAYNE GURLEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU CLARK, Lt, FNU DAWSON, Sgt, FNU KINNDER, C O and others
Otto Cauley v. FNU Dawson, et al
as 15-40219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTTO CAULEY
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU DAWSON, Warden, FNU STATS, Assistant Warden, FNU SAMUELS, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
