Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Taylor v. Forsyth et al
as 2:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Terry N. Taylor
Defendant:
Melisa Combs Forsyth, P.G. Rienhard, Richard A. Posner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love EL v. Easterbrook et al
as 1:2015cv03881
Plaintiff:
Sheik L Love EL
Defendant:
Frank H. Easterbrook, Ruben Castillo, Robert M. Dow, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School, et al
as 14-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY N. TAYLOR, Sheriff
Defendant - Appellee:
TULSA WELDING SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY OF TULSA HOSPITAL, WINNEBAGO COUNTY STATES ATTORNEY and others
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago County States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago Co. States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lim, Khor v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Scott Walker, Staples, Inc., Ron Sargant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carolyn H. Srivastava v. City of Chicago, et al
as 11-2171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, RICHARD L. YOUNG and others
Mary Robinson v. Lynn Adelman, et al
as 10-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY A. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN ADELMAN, Judge, PATRICIA J. GORENCE, FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Judge and others
Dwayne Griffin v. Frank H. Easterbrook, et al
as 10-1269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, WILLIAM J. BAUER, JOHN L. COFFEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
