Cases 11 - 20 of 13,391
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Flores
as 24-3519
Defendant:
REYES FLORES and Night Owl
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, BECKY SCOTT and OFC. JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corea-Flores et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Javier A Corea-Flores and Norma Mauricio
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Demaris (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01553
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Demaris
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Core Civic Prison for Profit, LLC, Core Civic Chairman and President and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel James Harper v. F. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
F. Flores and CSP Lancaster Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores-Vargas v. Garland
as 24-3477
Petitioner:
JULIO EDUARDO FLORES-VARGAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera Lozano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3453
Petitioner:
MELANIA HERRERA LOZANO, JONATHAAN FLORES HERRERA and MIRIAM FLORES HERRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03306
Plaintiff:
Cherry Lynn Flores
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
