Cases 11 - 20 of 325
Franklin v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Beverly Franklin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morris v. McFadden
as 3:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Franklin A. Morris
Defendant:
Garry McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendell et al v. Franklin County et al
as 5:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Meredith E. Wendell, Robert Terry, J.M.T. and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Nicki Perry, Andy Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
Ken Franklin
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
FRANKLIN v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
JOY G. FRANKLIN
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, THE RETIREMENT BOARD FOR DUKE UNIVERSITY and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Franklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
MILLS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00717
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN ALEXANDER MILLS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Green v. Franklin et al
as 5:2023ct03194
Plaintiff:
Sherman Green
Defendant:
Sergeant Franklin and Correctional Officer Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN JAMES MOSLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
