Cases 11 - 20 of 21
NEAL v. ASTA FUNDING, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04814
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHAUN NEAL
Defendant:
ASTA FUNDING, INC., GARY STERN, MANDELBAUM, SALSBURGH, LAZRIS & DISCENZA, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Neal v. Asta Funding, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
David Shaun Neal
Defendant:
Asta Funding, Inc. and Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Cigarette Labeling & Advertising Act
Neal v. Asta Funding, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
David Shaun Neal
Defendant:
Asta Funding, Inc. and Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Cigarette Labeling & Advertising Act
NEW WORLD SOLUTIONS, INC. et al v. ASTA FUNDING, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05307
Plaintiff:
NEW WORLD SOLUTIONS, INC. and DAVID SHAUN NEAL
Defendant:
ASTA FUNDING, INC. , ALPHASTAFF, INC. , GARY STERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stern et al v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated et al
as 1:2010cv02490
Plaintiff:
David Stern , Barbara Clabaugh and Gary Stern
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated and Rick Faby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
