Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Allen v. Good et al
as 7:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Defendant:
Sally Good, Sgt. Widener, Ofc. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynie v. Greensville Correctional Center Medical Services et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Wesley M. Haynie, Jr.
Defendant:
Greensville Correctional Center Medical Services, Armor Correctional Health Services, S. Dailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Youngkin et al
as 1:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dezachtre R. Goode
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Sears and Jason Miyaris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Goode v. 10th Judicial District et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Dezachtre R. Goode
Defendant:
10th Judicial District, Mecklenberg Commonwealth Attorney and Buddy A. Warp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Chesterfield Jail
as 3:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Annette Harris Goode
Defendant:
Chesterfield Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. Commonwealth
as 1:2021cv01282
Petitioner:
Dezachtre Goode
Respondent:
Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Good 'Nuff Garage, LLC v. McCulley et al
as 3:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
Good 'Nuff Garage, LLC doing business as GNG Motorsports
Defendant:
Colin McCulley, Kate Vehrs, Chester Dog Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Goode v. Landry
as 3:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
Ebony M. Goode
Defendant:
Judge Scott David Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goode v. Landry
as 3:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Ebony M. Goode
Defendant:
Judge Scott David Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
