Cases 11 - 20 of 72
HOOD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
GARY A HOOD
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AUCOIN et al v. FLOWERS FOODS INC et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
CK SALES CO LLC, FLOWERS FOODS INC and LEPAGE BAKERIES PARK STREET LLC
Plaintiff:
PETER CARR, GARY WHITE, MICHAEL BARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00170
Defendant:
TRAVIS ANDREWS, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SEAN MAGUIRE, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAPOINTE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
GARY LAPOINTE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00513
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUSSELL v. C R BARD INC et al
as 2:2019cv00413
Defendant:
C R BARD INC and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC
Plaintiff:
GARY L BUSSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. JOHNSTON
as 2:2019cv00360
Defendant:
GARY F JOHNSTON
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AURITT v. AURITT et al
as 2:2018cv00471
Plaintiff:
GARY AURITT
Defendant:
SHANNON AURITT, KATHLEEN HAMILTON and TAKE A SHOWER LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
KRISTIANSEN v. TOWN OF KITTERY et al
as 2:2018cv00420
Defendant:
KITTERY POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVE HAMEL, EDWARD F STRONG and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN A KRISTIANSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
