Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Knox v. Deputy John Doe
as 5:2015cv05035
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Knox
Defendant:
Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Bradley et al
as 5:2015cv05006
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Knox
Defendant:
Rhonda Bradley, Tim Helder, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH v. BUSH et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MARK SULLIVAN, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Preacher, et al v. Wiley, et al
as 09-1493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUKE PREACHER
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAXTER, AKA Richie Antonio Hall and DAWANE MALLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RON WILEY, Warden ADX-Florence, B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden USP Marion, J. FOX, Associate Warden ADX-Florence and others
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, BOYD N. BOLAND, ROBERT M. BLACKBURN and others
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, RON WILEY, ROBERT BAUER and others
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, RON WILEY, ROBERT BAUER and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Ron Wiley, Robert Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 08-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, BOYD N. BOLAND, ROBERT M. BLACKBURN and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2008cv02572
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Boyd N. Boland, Robert M. Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
