Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Carrington et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03229
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr., Harold Montgomery and Roy Goodman
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Yaya Bilal, Talib LNU, Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and others
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU LNU, FNU Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Ishee et al
as 5:2021ct03319
Plaintiff:
Johnny Kelly and Richard Wayne Goodman, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Paula Smith, P.A. Tolman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Reid et al
as 5:2021ct03155
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson and Robert H. Johnson
Defendant:
Joseph L. Rayfield, Michael Phillips, Captain Wester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunson v. Stein et al
as 5:2021ct03063
Defendant:
Yolanda K. Stith, Emily M. Baucom, James C. Gillen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eugene Brunson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Rominger et al
as 5:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Jasper J. Goodman and Jaska Hughes Rominger
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Goodman, et al.
as 5:2021ct03018
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
John Pack, Brett Leverton, Jasper Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lapardi v. Goodman et al
as 3:2020cv00679
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Nastassia Angelica Goodman
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Kay Lapardi and Cynthia Kay (Hawkins) Lapardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodman v. Nogo et al
as 5:2020ct03324
Defendant:
Butner Federal Medical Center and Dr. Nogo
Plaintiff:
Roy Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
