Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Rodriguez v. Alred et al
as 4:2022cv00189
Plaintiff: Mario Rodriguez and Mario Rodriguez, Jr
Defendant: PJ Alred, Summit Food Services, Ams Vending Machines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Big C, LLC v. Graham County Land Company, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00243
Plaintiff: Big C, LLC
Defendant: Graham County Land Company, LLC
AFS/IBEX v. Graham County Land Company, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00221
Plaintiff: AFS/IBEX
Defendant: Graham County Land Company, LLC
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company et al v. Graham County Land Company, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00148
Plaintiff: The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and The Phoenix Insurance Company
Defendant: Graham County Land Company, LLC
Type: Contract Insurance
Bowman v. Graham County Jail et al
as 4:2021cv00202
Plaintiff: Cody William James Bowman
Defendant: Graham County Jail and Graham County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Graham, County of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00073
Defendant: Graham County Sheriff's Office, PJ Allred, RoseMary Juarez-Lacey and others
Plaintiff: Deborah Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McMahan v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00010
Defendant: Joseph Jones and Graham County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff: Brent McMahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Labor Labor: Other
McMahan v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00009
Plaintiff: Reba McMahan
Defendant: Joseph Jones, Graham County Sheriff's Office and Jerry Crisp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?