Cases 11 - 20 of 300
Glenn Bowles, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
GLENN BOWLES, KENNETH FRANKS and ROBERT GARDNER
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER and DANA NESSEL
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1086
Plaintiff:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Hope v. Brady et al
as 7:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeVonne Hope, Sr
Defendant:
James Brady, Cecilia Quirindongo, Victoria Ann Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Right to Life of Michigan et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Right to Life of Michigan, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Gina Johnsen and others
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and Jocelyn Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Scott v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2023cv13125
Plaintiff:
Donald Dee Scott
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi E. Washington, Kim Cargor and others
Farr #607251 v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Domonique Demetris Farr #607251
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Law Revision Commission and People of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Rita Williams
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Frank G. Hillary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
