Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Mays v. Smith et al
as 5:2018ct03186
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, S. Ma'at, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roudabush v. Hollembaek et al
as 5:2018ct03104
Plaintiff:
James L. Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
S. Hollembaek, S. Butler, Lt. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH v. HOLLEMBAEK et al
as 1:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH
Defendant:
S. HOLLEMBAEK, SINGLETON, LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunlap v. Benge et al
as 3:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
Milton Dozier Dunlap, III
Defendant:
Robin A. Benge, NC Highway Patrol , City of Charlotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Milton Dozier Dunlap, III
Defendant:
City of Charlotte , C. H. Williams and M. J. Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HICKS v. MOUNT AIRY-SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
HICKS, WILLIAM ALFRED HICKS, JR. and BILLY HICKS
Defendant:
MOUNT AIRY-SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, JOHN SPRINGTHORPE, DONALD L. HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Buencamino v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03307
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Buencamino
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bey v. Cooper et al
as 3:2012cv00454
Plaintiff:
Yu'Sunrus Bey
Defendant:
Roy Cooper , Elaine F. Marshall , Martha H. Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Williams v. N.C. DOC Employee et al
as 5:2012ct03026
Plaintiff:
Romie H. Williams
Defendant:
N.C. DOC Employee and Tabor Corr. Inst.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
