Cases 11 - 20 of 74
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Harrell et al
as 1:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
David L. Harrell, Carolyn Harrell and Southern Land Brokers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Paulk et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 5:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Gerald Paulk, Yancy Tyler Roper, John Sanderson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jordan v. Powell et al
as 2:2021cv00200
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jordan
Defendant:
Nipper Transportation Inc., Christopher Powell and Elizabeth Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Harrell et al
as 2:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Johnny H. Harrell, The Insurance Company Of The State Of Pennsylvania, Federated Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cody Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01071
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Bill Franklin, Sgt. Heard and others
Plaintiff:
Alqurin Lavon Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. House et al
as 1:2020cv00535
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harrell
Defendant:
Officer Price, Officer House and Officer Slide
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. McKinney Drilling, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00268
Defendant:
Phil Andrews, McKinney Drilling, LLC, Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tyree Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harrell v. Backwater Marine Towing and Salvage, LLC. et al (CONSENT)
as 3:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Carlis Harrell
Defendant:
Chad Gilliland and Backwater Marine Towing and Salvage, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harrell v. Dennis
as 1:2019cv00963
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harrell
Defendant:
Davis Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
