Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
M-D Medical Services, Inc. v. M.A.S.H. Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00829
Defendant:
M.A.S.H., Inc., Gregory L Horn and Charles Bordenca
Plaintiff:
M-D Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M-D Medical Services, Inc. v. M.A.S.H., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00390
Defendant:
M.A.S.H., Inc., Gregory L. Horn and Charles Bordenca
Plaintiff:
M-D Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00509
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Horn v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2018cv00809
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Horn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Horn v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv00488
Plaintiff:
Allwin E Horn, III
Defendant:
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell et al v. Marshall et al (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+)
as 2:2017cv00768
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, County of Barbour, Alabama, Alabama Administrative Office of Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Miranda M. Mitchell and D.G.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act-Public Accommodations Private
Lowe v. Warrior, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2017cv01436
Plaintiff:
Crystal Nicole Lowe
Defendant:
Warrior, Alabama, City of, Raymond Horn and Steve Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. Carroll et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Matt Horne
Defendant:
Jon B. Carroll and Santanna Kenny McCrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
