Cases 11 - 20 of 284
Hunt v. USA
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Dashawn Raquan Hunt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hunt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02003
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
HEIRLOOM LEGACY LIFE, LLC et al v. FREEDOM & FAITH, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
HEIRLOOM LEGACY LIFE, LLC, TARA HUNT and KEVIN HUNTER
Defendant:
FREEDOM & FAITH, INC., FFA ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC., RYAN WIMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
LEE v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00638
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Plaintiff:
Connie Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cagle v. Ransom et al
as 5:2023ct03287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Cagle
Defendant:
G. Ransom, J. Hunt, Marie Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean-Laurent v. Hunt et al
as 5:2023ct03231
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jean-Laurent
Defendant:
P.O. Eugene Hunt, J.J. Harper, Sgt. J.C. Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Riddle v. The United States
as 5:2023ct03229
Plaintiff:
Herndon Hunt Outlaw Riddle
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
