Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parrish v. Dingman et al
as 3:2016cv03095
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wade Parrish
Defendant:
Jason Dingman , Dennis Hagenson and Hamilton County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beasley Rissman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
Ronnett Beasley Rissman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Arch Allison and Lynn Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Hamilton v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hamilton
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Monarch Cement of Iowa , The Monarch Cement Company and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0056
McCoy et al v. J & R Schugel Trucking, Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03078
Plaintiff:
Pearlie McCoy and Larry Blood
Defendant:
J & R Schugel Trucking, Inc , Dorothy Motley-Hamilton , Polman Transfer, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz v. Hamilton
as 4:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
Raul V Ruiz
Defendant:
Karin Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Raul Velasquez Ruiz , Jr
Defendant:
Karin Hamilton, Larry Noble and Chris Paulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Lodrigues et al
as 4:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frank A. Lodrigues, Kathleen Lodrigues, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heiden v. Unknown Deputy Clerk et al
as 3:2013cv03017
Plaintiff:
Wade Heiden
Defendant:
Unknown Deputy Clerk, Hamilton County Clerks Office and Hamilton County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
