Cases 11 - 20 of 2,251
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Gary Williams v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6156
Petitioner:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Dept. of Corrections
Hayes v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Mark Hayes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Lumpkin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6142
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Dir., Virginia Department of Corrections, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Hamilton Swart, III v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON H. SWART, III and RICHARD EARL DASILVA
Defendant:
JASON S. MIYARES and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
