Cases 11 - 20 of 65
HOOPER v. PRENLYN ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 2:2019cv04036
Defendant:
PRENLYN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HOOPER
IN RE: CHRISTOPHER HOOPER
as 2:2019cv03416
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEVIEN et al v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2019cv03239
Defendant:
TOBY RUFUS COPPEL, ROBERT CHARLES MICHAEL WIGLEY, ESTATE OF JOHN MICHAEL POCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEVIEN and JAMES WESTHEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOPER v. THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2019cv00399
Defendant:
MORGAN C. DAVIS, THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JOHN J. TALATER and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
KASSAB et al v. JOHN et al
as 2:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
ADAM C. KASSAB , YECHIEL PETER SCHWARTZ , THOMAS WHEELER and others
Defendant:
FRANCIS D. JOHN , THEODORE B. BAUM , PETER HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HOOPER v. SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
KEITH HOOPER
Defendant:
SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC. and CLEAN HARBORS, INC.
Mediator:
THOMAS L. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOYNER et al v. R.E. HOOPER SALVAGE LLC et al
as 5:2015cv06584
Plaintiff:
LAVERN JOYNER
Defendant:
R.E. HOOPER SALVAGE LLC, EDWARD T. WALKER and A&B CONSULTING
Thirdparty_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEOPLE'S UNITED EQUIPMENT FINANCE CORP. v. R.E. HOOPER SALVAGE LLC et al
as 2:2014mc00269
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE'S UNITED EQUIPMENT FINANCE CORP.
Defendant:
R.E. HOOPER SALVAGE LLC and RAYMOND E. HOOPER
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
ALEXANDER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, MICHAEL TKACS, HOOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
