Cases 11 - 20 of 242
Hughes v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2023cv05148
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hughes
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and The Harvest Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Richardson v. Gardner et al
as 4:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Gardner, John Hughes, Jamie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Gardner et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Gardner, John Hughes, Jamie Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Wesley W Hughes
Defendant:
Michelle Gray, Steven Rickette, K Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotner v. Taber et al
as 6:2023cv06034
Plaintiff:
Jordan C. Cotner
Defendant:
Donnie Taler, John Doe Deputies, Donnie Taber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorn v. Does
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
April Thorn
Defendant:
Does, Joseph Hughes and Judy Biaza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knowles v. Floyd et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Antreze Deun Knowles
Defendant:
Jamie Floyd, Cameron Hughes, Neely Crowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duran v. Hughs et al
as 3:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jason Henry Duran
Defendant:
Cameron Hughs and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dabney v. Rex et al
as 5:2022cv05251
Plaintiff:
Roy Anthony Dabney
Defendant:
Corporal Cody Rex and Deputy Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
