Cases 11 - 20 of 35
PARKS v. HORN, et al
as 2:2018cv00312
Defendant:
DANIEL A MANION, GREGORY HORN, DIANE P. WOOD and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Horn
as 1:2018cv00451
Defendant:
Daniel A Manion, Gregory Horn, Richard Posner and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Seely v. James Seely, et al
as 17-3535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SEELY, GWEN SEELY, CLERK OF THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS and others
Eric Mapes v. Indiana Court of Appeal
as 17-2691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC MAPES
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
MAPES v. INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
as 1:2017cv02591
Defendant:
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff:
ERIC MAPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Myers v. Tippecanoe County Superior Co, et al
as 16-4253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON T. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIPPECANOE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS, District Two, JAMES S. KIRSCH, Indiana Appellate Court Judge, in his official capacity and others
Myers v. Tippecanoe County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jason Tye Myers
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Circuit Court, Indiana Court of Appeals, James S Kirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lesley Scholl v. Indiana Court of Appeals, et al
as 16-2927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLEY SCHOLL
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS, INDIANA SUPREME COURT, JODI WILLIAMS and others
HOUZANME v. RUSH et al
as 1:2016cv00821
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARNES, SALLY JO HOUZANME, INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS and others
Plaintiff:
ULRICH TIBAUT HOUZANME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Robinson v. Knox County Indiana District A, et al
as 16-1021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA M. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KNOX COUNTY INDIANA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
