Cases 11 - 20 of 103
MCMILLAN et al v. GARRISON et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM H. MCMILLAN, L. M. and K. S.
Defendant:
WILLIAM GARRISON, MEGAN ONEY, STEPHEN WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osborne v. Miami County Courts et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Willis Osborne, Jr
Defendant:
Miami County Courts, Indiana State of, Grund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2022cv02366
Petitioner:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MULLIS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2022cv01763
Plaintiff:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Defendant:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. KUHN et al
as 1:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
LARRY KUHN, VICTOR GUARISCO, HALEY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPARD v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01331
Petitioner:
ANTHONY W. SHEPARD
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL, JR. v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HALL, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. SHULZE et al
as 1:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANCIE SHULZE, JACK ROSS, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Klock v. Indiana Parole Board, et al
as 21-2970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT KLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH and CRAIG SMITH
KYLES v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv02614
Plaintiff:
DEREK TYRONE KYLES, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, FREDERICK A. MEDLEY and JAMES W. SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
