Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Anderson v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
as 4:2021cv04168
Plaintiff:
Willie Renard Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
as 4:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Willie Renard Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) et. al.
as 4:2021cv02637
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) et. al.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
US v. Schofield
as 21-1220
Interested Party:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IRS-RACS
Defendant / Appellant:
BILLIE RUSSELL SCHOFIELD
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
David Meyers v. Dept. of the Treasury, et al
as 21-1476
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. Department of the Treasury and KCMO Internal Revenue Service, IRS Coronavirus CARES Act Claims Division
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Meyers
US v. Schofield
as 21-1054
Interested Party:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IRS-RACS
Defendant / Appellant:
BILLIE RUSSELL SCHOFIELD
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Alvin Waldo Whisenton v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service IRS
as 2:2020cv09043
Plaintiff:
Alvin Waldo Whisenton
Defendant:
Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service IRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buff v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv07182
Defendant:
Eric Gadsden, Celeste Neal, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Buff
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04810
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn
Sanchez v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of Austin, Texas
as 3:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of Austin, Texas
Plaintiff:
George A. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
