Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Goodwater v. County of Charleston et al
as 2:2017cv00998
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goodwater
Defendant:
County of Charleston , Charleston County Sheriff's Office , J Al Cannon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warthen v. Midgett et al
as 2:2016cv00931
Plaintiff:
Alonzo D Warthen
Defendant:
Adam L Midgett , John Doe Neal , Charleston County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinton v. Cannon et al
as 8:2015cv04148
Plaintiff:
Ellis Jerome Swinton, Sr
Defendant:
J Al Cannon, Jr, Charleston County, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinton v. Cannon et al
as 8:2015cv01931
Plaintiff:
Ellis Jerome Swinton, Sr
Defendant:
J Al Cannon, Jr and Charleston County Sheriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drayton v. Charleston, County of et al
as 2:2014cv03488
Plaintiff:
Willison Drayton
Defendant:
Charleston, County of, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, J Al Cannon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernicke v. J Al Cannon, Jr
as 8:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant:
J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Naarl Richard v. J. Cannon, Jr.
as 11-7364
Petitioner - Appellant:
NAARL RICHARD
Respondent - Appellee:
J. AL CANNON, JR.
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. MODICA, USASC and JAMES R. DUFFY, DEA US
Gorton v. Cannon
as 1:2011cv01744
Petitioner:
William Gorton
Respondent:
J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al
as 0:2011cv01508
Petitioner:
Naarl Richard
Respondent:
Immigration and Naturalization Service and J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charlton Dowling v. Gregory Voigt
as 11-6748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLTON JAVIER DOWLING
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY VOIGT, J. AL CANNON, JR., Esq. and CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
