Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Snodgrass v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr
Defendant:
K. Richardson, J. M. Branch, Beth Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filing Error
as 1:2023dp20002
Plaintiff:
Aric J. Fleming
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fleming v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023dp20003
Plaintiff:
Aric J Fleming
Defendant:
DePuy orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy Inc, depuy international limited and others
Steve Riddick v. Nurse Phillips
as 23-6006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
S. FRANKLIN, Captain, J. FLEMING, Lt., B. TAYLOR, Sgt. and others
Perciavalle v. McDonough
as 23-1117
Claimant:
JAMES J. PERCIAVALLE
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and ROBERT J. FLEMING, JR.
Terry Ofori v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, A. DAVID ROBINSON, LESLIE J. FLEMING and others
Terry Ofori v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, LESLIE J. FLEMING, A. DAVID ROBINSON and others
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee (ID 77035) v. Butler & Associates, P.A. et al
as 5:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Lavell Lee
Defendant:
Butler & Associates, P.A., David M. Braun, Zachary A. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Fleming et al
as 1:2021cv01373
Plaintiff:
Dwight Q. Jackson
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, D. Moore and C. Putney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
