Cases 11 - 20 of 107
WILKINS v. HERBIK et al
as 2:2021cv00756
Defendant:
DR. LANASA, DR. JIN BYUNGHAK and MICHAEL JOSEPH HERBIK
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN WILKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. WELLPATH COMMERCIAL et al
as 2:2021cv00377
Defendant:
DR. BYUNGHAK JIN, WELLPATH COMMERCIAL, JOHN DOES, 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jin et al v. Lantzch
as 1:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Emily T. Lantzch
Plaintiff:
Victor H. Sparrow, III and Ying Jin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. THE PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv00794
Defendant:
MR. KNEPPER, THE PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, C.O. 1 BAGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McKeown v. Qin Lin et al
as 3:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Jin Y Trading, Inc. and Qin Lin
Plaintiff:
Tristyn McKeown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOP TOBACCO, L.P. et al v. EASY WHOLESALE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04464
Defendant:
SANG HEUM CHO, DUK JOO CHO, DK JOO INC. and others
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES (NA), LLC, TOP TOBACCO, L.P. and REPUBLIC TOBACCO, L.P.
Respondent:
TOM SANGHEUM CHO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
JIN et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv02955
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KI SEOK JIN and HYE KYUNG JIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00479
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, STEPHAN LONGSTRETH and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BEAU HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERKIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
DEPUTY ERIC AMEL, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EYAJAN v. NESCO RESOURCE LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
BILL KAYDO, RANDY EDWARDS, COMMUNITY HEALTH NET and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
