Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Abdul-Hamza Muhammad v. Commonwealth of Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6208
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABDUL-HAMZA WALI MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, HAROLD W. CLARKE, DEBRA D. GARDNER and others
In re: John McQueen
as 16-3087
Petitioner: In re: JOHN MCQUEEN
John McQueen v. Krystina Weibling-Holliday
as 15-4000
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN MCQUEEN
Defendant - Appellee: KRYSTINA T. WEIBLING-HOLLIDAY
McQueen v. Commissioner of the IRS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02777
Plaintiff: John McQueen
Defendant: Commissioner of the IRS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
McQueen v. Weibling-Holliday
as 3:2015cv01197
Plaintiff: John McQueen
Defendant: Krystina T. Weibling-Holliday
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McQueen v. Heinzmann et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01071
Plaintiff: John McQueen
Defendant: Henry G. Heinzmann and Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levi Springer v. Tori Raiford
as 15-6788
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee: TORI RAIFORD, Prison Unit Manager, HAROLD W. CLARKE, D.O.C. Director, GEORGE HINKLE, D.O.C. Regional Director and others
Jacob Peyton v. John Comb
as 15-6129
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Defendant - Appellee: MAJOR JOHN C. COMBS, Head of Security at WRSP, SERGEANT NATHAN D. JACKSON and MICHAEL A. STEELE, K9 Officer
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARK, Director Dept. of Corr., RANDALL MATHENA, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison, MR. JEFF KISER, Asst. Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Rahmon Robey v. Randall Mathena
as 14-6027
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHMON R. ROBEY
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA and JOHN MCQUEEN, Institutional Investigator
John McQueen v. USA
as 13-6263
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN MCQUEEN
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?