Cases 11 - 20 of 37
McClanahan et al v. Natchitoches Nursing & Rehabilitation Center L L C et al
as 1:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
Peggy Ann McCleland, Marshell Ray Jones, Stacy D. Jones and others
Defendant:
Kacey Masters, Natchitoches Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, Miranda Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26495
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18386
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Azar
as 1:2019cv00477
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Plaintiff:
John Paul Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Murphy v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Zapata, Officer R. Rodriguez, P. Amobi and others
Plaintiff:
Preston Wayne Villines and John Paul Jones Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Burwell
as 16-2234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAUL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
Michael Skidmore, et al v. Warner Chappell Music, Inc.
as 16-56287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL SKIDMORE, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RANDY CRAIG WOLFE TRUST
Defendant:
LED ZEPPELIN, JAMES PATRICK PAGE, ROBERT ANTHONY PLANT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC
Jones v. Burwell
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
John Paul Jones
Defendant:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
