Cases 11 - 20 of 46
YASHAR'AL v. SWAIN et al
as 1:2018cv02798
Respondent:
MARC KELLAMS, BRIAN RISNER, JOSHUA L. RADICKE and others
Petitioner:
DORAN ACHASHVEROSH YASHAR'AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. LAYTON
as 1:2018cv02478
Defendant:
JOHN R. LAYTON
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Layton
as 4:2018cv00121
Respondent:
Norman Chaffins and JOHN R. LAYTON
Petitioner:
ADRIAN BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KENWORTHY v. LAYTON
as 1:2018cv01557
Petitioner:
KRAIG A. KENWORTHY
Respondent:
JOHN R. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BERTRAM v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2018cv01401
Plaintiff:
DEVON BERTRAM
Defendant:
JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH TWENTY and JOHN R. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yusuf Hotep-El v. Alicia Gooden, et al
as 18-1983
Petitioner - Appellant:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
ALICIA GOODEN, RICHARD HAGENMIER, BRYAN ROACH and others
Yusuf Hotep-El v. Alicia Gooden, et al
as 18-1985
Petitioner - Appellant:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
ALICIA GOODEN, RICHARD HAGENMIER, BRYAN ROACH and others
BENNETT v. LAYTON
as 1:2018cv01197
Petitioner:
ADRIAN BENNETT
Respondent:
NORMAN CHAFFINS and JOHN R. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STEWART v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2018cv00305
Respondent:
JOHN R. LAYTON, SHERIFF, MARION COUNTY and STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Antonio Lopez-Aguilar, et al v. State of Indiana, et al
as 18-1050
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTONIO LOPEZ-AGUILAR
Appellant:
STATE OF INDIANA, Proposed Intervenor
Defendant - Appellee:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JOHN R. LAYTON, Sheriff, in both his official capacity and in his individual capacity and SERGEANT DAVIS, in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
