Cases 11 - 18 of 18
KAUL v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2018cv08086
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, M.D.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J CHRISTIE, Jay Howard Solomon, THE NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Kaul v. Christie et al
as 1:2018cv03131
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Christopher J. Christie, Jay Howard Solomon, The New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicklas, et al v. Kelly, et al
as 4:2017cv03131
Defendant:
John Does (1-50), Joe Kelly and Lancaster County Attorney
Plaintiff:
Michelle Nicklas, Jane Roes (1-50) and John Roes (1-50)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaul v. Christopher J. Christe, Esq. et al
as 2:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE , STATE OF NEW JEREY , Jeffrey Chiesa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kaul v. Christopher J. Christe, Esq. et al
as 3:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Christopher J. Christe, Esq., STATE OF NEW JEREY, Jeffrey Chiesa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kaul v. Christopher J. Christe, Esq. et al
as 1:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Christopher J. Christe, Esq., State of New Jerey, Jeffrey Chiesa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. SHAMS QURESHI, M.D., et al
as 2:2013cv05850
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY , ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SHAMS QURESHI, M.D., MICHAEL DOBROW, D.O., TAI PAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy et al v. Doc's Sports Retreat, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv13383
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Murphy , Christina Ary , Natalie Jolin and others
Defendant:
Doc's Sports Retreat, LLC, Lucky's on 7, Lucky's on Seven and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
