Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Raymond Chestnut v. Rory Thompson
as 14-7207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Defendant - Appellee:
RORY THOMPSON, Correctional Officer, T. MCGIRT, Correctional Officer, individual and in their official capacities, LEROY JONES and others
Defendant:
LARRY D. JONES, Lieutenant
Phelan v. Zenzen
as 14-727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant - Appellee:
S. Zenzen, Senior Counselor, Deputy Superintendent of Programs at Five Points Correctional Facility, Bennett, Correctional Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Parish, Sargent at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Phelan v. Zenzen
as 12-4715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant - Appellee:
S. Zenzen, Senior Counselor, Deputy Superintendent of Programs at Five Points Correctional Facility, Bennett, Correctional Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Parish, Sargent at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Charles Riley v. J. Townsend
as 10-6862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES R. RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. R. TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden, L. JONES, Lieutenant and ANDERSON, Sergeant
Edward Dutton v. Montgomery County Maryland
as 09-2016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD L. DUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND, SAM HSU, Captain, MARCUS WESTOVER and others
Melvin Munir v. Thomas, et al
as 09-15727
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MELVIN MUNIR
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS, Sergeant
Defendant:
MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, MURRAY, Sergeant and JONES, Lieutenant
Marvellous Greene, Sr. v. J. Jones, et al
as 09-15414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVELLOUS A. GREENE, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
J. JONES, Lieutenant, CCI, M. CARRASCO, Associate Warden, CCI, L. L. SCHULTEIS, Chief Deputy Warden and others
William White, Jr. v. Tim Barbour
as 08-6961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM WHITE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM BARBOUR, DAVID ALLEN, CAPTAIN STRICKLAND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
