Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Staton et al v. Holzbach et al
as 3:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Patrick Carrol, Dennis P. McDonough, Sedensky, III and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton and Ezra Staton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mclean v. Uconn Health et al
as 3:2019cv01792
Defendant:
Jamie Freeman, Roy D. Beebe, Zachary Cavanaugh and others
Plaintiff:
Demetry Mclean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross et al v. Bluechip Financial et al
as 3:2019cv01520
Defendant:
Jamie Azure, Vice Chairman Lynn Gourneau, Carson Belgarde and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Gross and Krista Biehl
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Geiger et al v. C&G of Groton, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jamie Eason Middleton, Brenda Lynn Geiger, Cora Skinner and others
Defendant:
Service Road Corporation d/b/a Mynx Hartford, C&G of Groton, Inc. d/b/a Mynx Groton, Alfred Ciraldo and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Perfekta Creative Corporation and F&F Distributors, Incorporated The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. $56,000.00 in United States Currency
as 3:2019cv00262
Claimant:
Jamie Fitzpatrick
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$56,000.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Fitzgerald v. Danbury et al
as 3:2018cv01946
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Jamie Hodge and City of Danbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Trowell v. Jamie
as 3:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
Freddie Trowell
Defendant:
Jamie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
